The contractor lost the court case twice due to road repairs in the village of Baramzy.

      Earlier, the company "Miga" completed the asphalting of the road in the village of Baramzy in the Kirov region. A warranty period of 10 years was established for the work. A year later, cracks, ruts, and patches of grass growing through the surface appeared on the road. The customer, the company "GoodHouse," demanded that the road be put in order, but it was not possible to reach an agreement with the contractor on this matter. The customer then turned to the Arbitration Court of the Kirov region, which granted the claim and obliged the contractor to fulfill the warranty obligations. After that, the contractor filed an appeal. He referred to improper operation of the facility and the reduction of costs (due to a decrease in the amount of sand and gravel), which he allegedly insisted on. However, the Second Arbitration Appeal Court ruled that there were no grounds for releasing the contractor from compliance with the warranty obligations. It left the appeal unsatisfied, stating that it was the contractor who proposed the technical solutions according to which the work was carried out. It is still unknown whether the parties will meet in cassation.