"We do not work for the enemy": Deputies Mamaev and Bikaluk were angered by the "accusation of treason against the Motherland."

      The speaker accused the deputies not in private, but gave a comment to a pro-government media outlet, thus publicizing his more than controversial and "offensive opinion." On July 24, "enemy agents" Sergey Pavlinovich and Albert Alexandrovich merely sent a request to the chairman of the ZSKO for an extraordinary plenary session to discuss security issues in the region. In order to hear the Government's report "on the anti-terrorist (non-) protection of life support facilities, infrastructure, and the population." About the coordination of the work of government bodies and local self-government with law enforcement agencies in the context of increased threats. As well as the additional measures taken to inform the population about the procedures to follow in the event of terrorist threats. Meanwhile, the head of the city administration, Vyacheslav Simakov, in footage from a recent speech at a City Duma meeting, condescendingly asserted that "there are protective structures, but there is no need for them today." Promising the questioning deputy Vladimir Malkov to personally "inform him of the necessary addresses separately." However, in the deputy initiative, where the voices of hundreds of thousands of Kirov residents were heard, Beresnev saw only "an attempt to build political capital," which, in his opinion, "looks cynical." And this hardly corresponds to the task of deputies, who conveyed the will of the people, realizing on July 24 that each of them is "guilty of the death" in such a "protected territory." "Under the governor's leadership (quote), an operational headquarters is working. And to present such initiatives that create division and doubt in society in today's situation means to work for the enemy. Moreover, bringing up issues that simply cannot - for the sake of information security - be discussed openly," stated Roman Beresnev. It is likely that the speaker did not consider how important today's "doubts" are to the parents and spouses of the deceased, who would prefer to know about the "leadership" and "operational headquarters" before that morning when at 6:48 the lives of their children and loved ones were abruptly interrupted by a missile that struck the factory. As it became known, on July 30, Sergey Mamaev and Albert Bikaluk were questioned by an employee of the Center for Countering Extremism. Who required that the statements of the deputies be rewritten on... standard forms. And it was necessary to put not just a signature and date under them, but with a clarification: recorded correctly from my words, read by me. And the fact that the ordinary statements of the deputies somehow did not satisfy the "fighters against extremism," and that the "rewriting" took place under the watchful eye of a police major, looks as if Mamaev and Bikaluk protocolled their signatures on a document that will turn out, at best, to be a mere response, and more likely not in their favor.