The traces of the billion-dollar embezzlers Kintzler led to the convicted Colonel Voronov.

      Despite the fact that the 500-million "disappearance" of real estate is currently linked only to two properties — residential and property complexes, respectively, in Yamalo-Nenets and Kirov, located at Filatova Street, 12. In the first case, according to inventory data, there was a shortfall of more than 300 million rubles in the bankruptcy estate of "YSGD." In the second case, the volume of embezzlement, including as a result of sales at undervalued prices, amounted to no less than 200 million rubles.

      Interestingly, the conclusions of the Arbitration Courts regarding the existence of a half-billion shortfall are not final, as the materials of the judicial investigation contain a statement from Viktor Pochuev, the "shadow leader of the bankruptcy process" (the civil partner of the first bankruptcy manager of the "Trust," Elena Urvanceva), about the "disappearance from the bankruptcy estate of 'YSGD' of property worth 615 million rubles."

      Much can be contained — and it will contain

      By the way, analyzing the situation with the sale of buildings and warehouses on Filatova, SOCPROF, representing the interests of the employees of the "Trust" and creditors, discovered in the list of buyers of the kincler property practically a blatant "Kirov trace," leading directly to the former deputy head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs — ex-colonel Andrei Voronov. In September of last year, he was sentenced to six years in a "strict regime" colony and a fine of 19.3 million rubles for "receiving a bribe in a large amount" and "exceeding official powers out of selfish and other personal interest." This is unlikely to leave the former colonel without "the last pair of pants," as only his wife's jewelry was confiscated for a sum of about a hundred million rubles.

      Of particular interest among the "Kirov tailors," who almost freely plundered the property of "YSGD," is Mikhail Korsakov, whose "special relationship with Voronov" has been tracked by the authorities since 2020, when the question of a candidate for the position of general director of Kirov's "Gazprom," which became vacant even before the verdict against Sergey Kameko, was being resolved. It is likely that Andrei Voronov, who was separately involved in initiating a criminal case against the "main gas worker" for four episodes of "commercial bribery in particularly large amounts," facilitated the acceleration of the process for "removing Kameko."

      Probably, as a thank you for assistance in the reshuffle of the "gas leadership," one of the deputies of the head became Mikhail Korsakov, who is referred to as "Voronov's friend" among his circle. Despite the fact that Korsakov knew no more about gasification than the average consumer, as his visible commercial interests were limited to working in the private company "Les Dom Sad."

      Korsakov did not work long in "Gazprom" — until he was caught for a large bribe. And it was then that the authorities raised the question of whether the size of the bribe was too large for an "average Gazprom clerk"? And was there a plan to transfer part of the bribe to Korsakov's patron?

      Shortly thereafter, Mikhail Korsakov allegedly became a figure in the criminal case against Andrei Voronov as a "partner," but, not waiting for the court, signed a contract and voluntarily went to the SVO.

      By the way, since 2016, statements about the embezzlement of the bankruptcy estate of the "Trust 'YSGD'," including the property complex at Filatova, 12, have regularly been submitted to the regional BEP, signed by employees and creditors of the company. And with the same regularity, they were returned as "refusal materials," often signed by the head of the department — Colonel Oleg Luchinin. His name has been repeatedly mentioned in the investigation of the "Voronov case" as his executive subordinate. The same goes for the "case of Lieutenant Colonel Ovsyannikov," for whom the court extended the measure of restraint "detention" for another two months on April 8. In which, according to a law enforcement source, Luchinin may be approved for the status of "partner."

      An investigation from the sandbox?

      On November 11 of last year, what seemed to be a turning point in the case of the disappearance of kincler billions occurred when the Arbitration Court issued a private ruling to the Investigative Committee about the need to investigate "the circumstances of the falsification of documents by the first bankruptcy manager Elena Urvanceva." She has managed to avoid any meetings and contacts with law enforcement agencies since 2022. And either continues to successfully play hide and seek, or she is not being sought, despite a direct order from the prosecutor's office dated as early as 2024.

      On November 12, the Investigative Committee transferred materials regarding Urvanceva to the city BEP, where they remained unyieldingly until mid-March. On the 16th, the investigator in the case contacted SOCPROF, which had spent "a ton of paper" on complaints "about inaction," notifying that the investigation had been extended until April 16. And asked for help in searching for Urvanceva and Pochuev, witnesses, and victims.

      As explained by the head of the Kirov branch of SOCPROF, Igor Bondar, former employees of "YSGD" visited the investigator on Saturdays, as on working days he was occupied with "three other materials."

      "If anyone thinks that the case will move from a dead point, then I believe, unfortunately... A young junior lieutenant, who started service on February 16, received materials about the embezzlement of three kincler billions, which were not enough to cover just a three-million creditor debt — despite the fact that for a good ten years, none of the law enforcement agencies have persistently dealt with them... However, in response to the question of whether there is anything new in the case, the junior officer "for economic crimes" replies that "this is an operational secret." But I was particularly impressed when I mentioned General Alexei Rozuvan in the conversation, to which the officer reacted with the question: "Who is that?" Bondar said.

      However, Igor Viktorovich, reasonably believing that on April 16, when five months will have passed since the Arbitration Court issued a private ruling regarding the bankruptcy manager, the results of the investigation will remain at a dead point, SOCPROF will appeal to the General Prosecutor's Office, which in October last year the Constitutional Court empowered to check "bankruptcy transactions" that harm creditors and the state.

      As well as to the regional prosecutor, to remind that in early February, Prosecutor General Alexander Gutsan ordered regions to strictly control — at any stage of the investigation — the activities of the police in cases of bankruptcy of legal entities.