Has Olga Ryseva been moved to the ministerial rearguard?

      This was reported in the regional Ministry of Education, emphasizing that "the news arrived unexpectedly." And, most likely, after Alexander Sokolov's meeting with Sergey Kravtsov, head of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.

      As a ministerial source reported on April 14, the Gray house considers Olga Nikolaevna's removal to be "a concrete weakening of Dmitry Kurdyumov's political ambitions," who allegedly took an active part in her transition (in 2018) from an accounting position to a teaching position. As well as Kurdyumov's personal long-term mentoring of the "chief regional teacher."

      "A year earlier, when thunder and lightning rang out over Olga Nikolaevna's head in connection with the first wave of indignation at the failure of the national project "Education", so that even the search for an heir from among the directors of Kirov lyceums began, the deputy chairman managed to keep her at work, using the power of his own then almost vertical political index. Although the symbiosis of Dmitry Alexandrovich, as the curator of the industry, and Olga Nikolaevna, as the minister, can hardly be called partnership or respectful. After all, when "Kurdyumov's ears" were whispering behind the scenes at Ryseva's back, subordinates knew that the deputy chairman could easily bark on the phone: "Come to me with documents — trot"! That's such a pun," the interlocutor shared his opinion.

      Although, according to his version, the issue of Rysevsky's "compliance with the position" was raised by the governor back in 2022, when the head of the region allegedly drew attention to the "low degree of professional aptitude" and "slight tongue-tied" of the pedagogical major.

      "If we recall those years, then the problems of school education, apart from the joyful slogans about the construction of a dozen new schools, did not sound from the word "at all." There was more underhand fuss with the regional award "Elite of Education of the Kirov region" initiated by the disgraced Alexander Churin, when all teachers and pedagogues dreamed of getting a million. But the school administration scared teachers with dismissal for participating in the competition, and the laureates with punishments. However, as you know, a dog barks — a caravan is coming: prizes are distributed annually, and problems in education have reached sky-high heights," says one of the veterans of pedagogical work. Who, accepting pedagogy in its "pure form," believes that "It serves him right."

      Education as a political resource and failure

      Interestingly, Olga Ryseva's "fall from office" was predicted this February, when the Minister of Education of the Russian Federation, Sergei Kravtsov, officially declared the Kirov region "the leader in the failure to implement the Federal Project for the construction and modernization of schools": only five of the ten planned were built. And he secured "the first place on the red line" for the region.

      The Kirov government did not deny the words of the Russian minister, but at the same time noted that they "became hostages of the situation." Because "they consciously put themselves under the responsibility of an arch-difficult undertaking personally... Dmitry Kurdyumov. Who only "by force of power" introduced Kirov into the presidential Education program.

      By the way, Alexey Zherdev, who began overseeing the construction industry in September 2022, spoke about the complexity of Putin's project at a meeting of the City Duma. According to him, "it became obvious to the new leadership of the region that fulfilling obligations on time was almost impossible":

      "We had only three months to think about making a decision — we are withdrawing from the project and returning the federal money or... Then the governor said, "No matter how difficult it is, the children have nothing to do with it. And the city will never have a chance to get ten schools at once, so we're working on taking responsibility for ourselves."

      But at first, two ministers of construction, Igor Seleznev and Yuri Beresnev, took "responsibility for themselves" (respectively, one after the other) (they were the ones who were presented to Kravtsov "guilty of disruption"). Although Seleznev left his position almost before the "new government" realized that urgent execution of the school project was impossible. And Beresnev stated this openly-irritatingly, despite the publicly demonstrated optimism of the regional bosses.

      So, defining the circle of those responsible for the disruption of the national project, only four can be named (after all, the construction ministers have already been "punished"): Governor Alexander Sokolov, curator of the construction industry Alexey Zherdev, curator of "education" Dmitry Kurdyumov and Minister of Education Olga Ryseva. And, to quote a well-known politician in Kirov: "That's what political ethics is for, so as not to yell at yourself at every corner," then there are few candidates "for the next embrasure." More precisely, just one ...

      however, it was planned that the Kirov report on the — finally — commissioning of five unfinished schools would be heard no earlier than October-November. Although, as expected Newsler.ru By the end of the year, the number of unfinished buildings will not decrease to zero, but will increase to six or seven. Which Sergey Kravtsov will be unpleasantly surprised at, since he was not informed that there were not five under- and un-completed schools, but eight — after all, three general contractors simply extended the "deadlines".

      And only two schools are predicted to be ready for the next academic year — the Zhelezno company is probably almost ready to give up in the Sheveli settlement, and the Monolit IC on Stroiteley Avenue. So by the end of the year, the Kirov region risks not strengthening itself on the "red line", but flying out of its borders along with those or those who are declared guilty.

      As explained by an interlocutor close to the regional leadership, when meeting with Sergey Kravtsov, the governor could not confirm, as promised earlier, the March commissioning of the school in Sheveli. So the search for the "extreme" was crowned with the name of Rysev.

      Next in line

      If you follow the short list of "those who have assumed responsibility", reading from right to left, then the next one — before Ryseva — is Dmitry Kurdyumov, deputy chairman of the regional government. Kirov politicians consider him likely to be "primarily responsible" for the disruption of the obviously unfeasible Education project. Even those connected by the bonds of a "political tacit politician" agree with this:

      "Then Dmitry Kurdyumov, who personally identified the school construction sites, was repeatedly informed that the territories were not suitable for "children's construction." But apart from retaliatory anger, they did not achieve anything," recalls an employee of the Ministry of Construction. The employee understood that thoughtlessly selected land plots had already been included in the Federal Draft and could not be replaced.

      Let's remind that back in 2020 Newsler.ru He wrote about the "impossibility of completing three schools on time": in Zubarevsky Forest, in Dolgushino and on Stroiteley Avenue, if, of course, logic is included, sanity and sanitary standards are allowed.

      So, the first school in Zubarevsky forest is located a hundred meters from a cattle burial ground with an indefinite period of territorial alienation from any, let alone school, construction. This was openly stated by Deputy Denis Erokhin, appealing to the conscience of surveillance, which cannot allow the appearance of a children's institution next to a preserved cemetery of rabies viruses, plague and other deadly diseases.

      Deputy Vladimir Zhuravlev has repeatedly stated the madness of people who decided to build a school on Stroiteley Avenue, next to cancer and tuberculosis dispensaries (as well as an already inactive gas station), fenced off from children by a dozen coniferous trees.

      As well as the "Comintern version", which is definitely not scrupulous, since the Dolgushinsky swamp, if a mistake was made in the design or construction, threatened to flood the new neighborhood.

      At the same time, all local contractors — from construction monsters to mid—level companies — refused general contracts, saying that the underground river in the Zubarevsky forest, the swamp in the Comintern and oncology for Construction Workers were a guarantee that educational institutions would not be commissioned by 2022 or 2024. Since the projects are "too complicated," the preparatory work is very expensive, which will "eat up" not only the deadlines, but also the 49 percent advance. Despite the fact that the 2020 estimates in 2024-2025 are unlikely to cover the "construction costs" even by 60 percent.

      At that time, the regional government called it a "cartel agreement," although it was an understandable reluctance of the owners of construction companies to drive themselves into impossible deadlines and debt obligations.

      By the way, answering the question Newsler.ru Are the Government going to name someone who, in all conscience, should take on most of the responsibility for disrupting the presidential project, especially since Kravtsov was very angry last February and this April, and the Kirov assessment could not be worse, which is not for a political career? This does not bode well, it was correctly reported that "ethics dictates the rules" ...

      But then, with the "right political game", the list of those responsible should be read from left to right, even though, as a source from the "gray house" assured, the true story of the failure is known to many.